CIA sends teams of Libya; US considers rebel aid
WASHINGTON (AP) — The CIA has sent small teams of operatives into Libya and helped rescue a crew member of a U.S. fighter jet that crashed, and the White House said Wednesday it was assessing "all types of assistance" for rebels battling Moammar Gadhafi's troops. Battlefield setbacks are hardening the U.S. view that the poorly equipped opposition probably is incapable of prevailing without decisive Western intervention, a senior U.S. intelligence official told The Associated Press.
Lawmakers, in private briefings with top Obama administration officials, asked tough questions about the cost of the military operation and expressed concern about the makeup of the rebels.
Members of Congress quoted officials as saying the U.S. military role would be limited, and heard President Barack Obama's director of national intelligence compare the rebel forces to a "pick-up basketball team."
"No decision has been made about providing arms to the opposition or to any groups in Libya," said White House press secretary Jay Carney. "We're not ruling it out or ruling it in."
The CIA's precise role in Libya is not clear. Intelligence experts said the CIA would have sent officials to make contact with the opposition and assess the strength and needs of the rebel forces in the event Obama decided to arm them.
An American official and a former U.S. intelligence officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information, told the AP about the CIA's involvement in Libya after the agency was forced to close its station in Tripoli, the capital.
They said CIA helped safely recover the F-15E Strike Eagle's weapons specialist, who was first picked up by rebels after the crash March 21. The pilot was rescued by Marines.
They suffered only minor injuries, the military has said. Officials have declined to say what mission the F-15 was on at the time it went down. The crew ejected after the aircraft malfunctioned during a mission against a Libyan missile site.
The former intelligence officer said some CIA officers had been staging from the agency's station in Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates.
The New York Times first reported the CIA had sent in groups of CIA operatives and that British operatives were directing airstrikes. Obama said in a national address Monday night that U.S. troops would not be used on the ground in Libya. The statement allowed for wiggle room as the president explores options in case he decides to use covert action to ship arms to the rebels and train them. That would require a presidential finding.In that event, the CIA would take the lead, as it has done in the past such as in Afghanistan after the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks and the run-up to the Iraq invasion in 2003. In those covert action programs, CIA officers along with special operation forces were sent in, providing arms to opposition forces to help fight the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.
Gadhafi's land forces outmatch the opposition by a wide margin and are capable of threatening the civilian resistance, said the senior U.S. intelligence official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.
Lawmakers met with Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, Adm. Mike Mullen, and director of national intelligence James Clapper.
"They're absolutely committed to keeping the U.S. role limited," said Democratic Rep. Earl Blumenauer. "Nobody is making guarantees we'll be out in two weeks."
The top NATO commander, U.S. Navy Adm. James Stavridis, has said he's seen "flickers" of al-Qaida and Hezbollah among the rebels, but no evidence of significant numbers within the political opposition group's leadership.
During the meeting, Clapper, the intelligence head, indicated that intelligence has identified a few questionable individuals within the rebel ranks but no significant presence, according to lawmakers.
Lawmakers expressed frustration because administration officials couldn't say when the U.S. operation might end.
Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, said Clinton and Gates did not provide much information about the future in Libya."Do we arm the rebels? What happens if Gadhafi holds on? What is our next move?" said Smith.
Smith said arming the rebels may make sense, but added, "I think we have to figure out who exactly we would be arming. There are a lot of different rebel groups. I think we need greater intelligence on who is on the ground."
The Pentagon put the cost of the Libyan operation so far at $550 million. Blumenauer said officials estimated the cost could be $40 million a month depending on the length of the operation for the U.S. "It could be higher," he aid. Lawmakers, especially Republicans, are smarting from what they consider a lack of consultation from the administration and Obama's decision not to seek congressional authorization for the use of force.The briefings — the Senate had a separate session later Wednesday — came 12 days after the no-fly zone began. Obama did speak to congressional leaders the day before the military action began.
"I understand how evil Gadhafi is. I don't understand the unwillingness to come to Congress first," said Republican Rep. Greg Walden.Republicans, however, don't speak with one voice on the issue.
Republican Sen. John McCain, Obama's 2008 presidential rival, said the president couldn't wait for Congress to take even a few days to debate the use of force because "there would have been nothing left to save in Benghazi," the rebels' de-facto capital.
Stavridis told the House Armed Services Committee that "the strike part of this and the aviation combat air patrol will be filled largely by the allies" and the U.S. will focus on things such as "intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance, refueling ... combat search and rescue."
Still, committee members had reservations.
"It is a mission that I'm concerned as to whether or not its goals are clear. And also I'm a little concerned and believe it's unclear as to who we are supporting in this conflict," said Republican Rep. Michael Turner.
Said freshman Republican Rep. Chris Gibson, who did four Army combat tours in Iraq: "I think we have so much on the plate right now that we need to do to bring to closure with regard to Iraq and Afghanistan."
An Associated Press-GfK poll found the country split on U.S. involvement in military actions in Libya, with 48 percent approving and 50 percent disapproving.
About three-quarters say it's somewhat likely that U.S. forces will be involved in Libya for the long term. Fifty-five percent say they would favor the United States increasing its military action to remove Gadhafi from power, although only 13 percent favor U.S. ground troops, a step Obama has said he would not take.
The poll was conducted in the days leading up to the president's speech.
(기사내용)
미 중앙정보부 리비아에 요원파견
미국 정보부 관리의 의하면 서방의 결정적 지원이 없으면 무기가 빈약한 반군이 전쟁에서 승리할 수 없다는 미국의 견해가 점차 굳어지고 있는 가운데 중앙정보부 요원이 추락한 미군전투기 조종사 구출하고 반군이 필요한 무기에 대해 평가하기 하기 위해 작은 팀이 파견되었다.
AP통신에 의하면 리비아의 트리폴리 CIA 지국이 폐쇄되어 정보부요원들은 UAE 두바이 지국에서 활동 중 이라고 한다. 중앙정보부 요원은 추락한 미 조종사 구출을 지원하고 미 해병대가 구출에 참가했다. 경상을 당한 조종사들은 비행 목적에 대해서 함구하고 있으나 리비아 미사일 기지 폭격중 기계고장으로 추락한 것이다. 뉴욕타임스 보도에 의하면 미 정보부요원과 영국정보부 요원이 공중 폭격을 지휘하고 있다고 밝혔다.
오바마는 국민과의 대화에서 "리비아 미 지상군 투입 하지 않을 것이다" 고 말함으로써 반군에게 무기를 지원하고 훈련시키는 비밀작전을 수행할 수 있게 되었다. 2001년 9월 11일 사태이후 정보부 요원들은 아프카니스탄과 이라크에서 비밀작전을 수행하기 위해 투입되었다. 미국 정보당국은 카다피군 과 반군간의 큰 군사력 차이로 시민군에 위협이 되고 있다고 한다. 미 의회의원들은 국방장관, 국무장관, 합참의장, 국가정보처장등과 회동하고 민주당의원들은 미국의 역할은 제한적이다 고 강조했다.
미 국방부는 현재 까지 5억5천만 달러의 전비가 소요되었으며 한 달에 4천만 달러 소요 예상 된다고 했다. 공화당의원들 행정부가 군사력을 사용하기 전에 의회의 승인을 받지 않았다고 비난하고 있지만 공화당은 한 목소리를 내지 못하고 있다. 미국 공화당 메케인 의원은 뱅가지를 살리기 위해서는 수일도 기다릴 수 있는 여유가 없었다고 말했다.
여론조사에서 미국인 48%가 미군의 리비아 개입에 찬성하고 50% 가 반대하는데 많은 미국인들은 미국이 결국 리비아에서 장기전을 하게 될 것으로 생각하고 있다. 미국인 55% 가 카다피 정권교체에 찬성하고 13%는 지상군 파병을 찬성하나 오바마는 지상군을 파병하지 않겠다고 말한 바 있다.
·
KNS뉴스통신 kns@kns.tv
